SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 132

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SUBAN ALI MOLLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 28126 / 2025



07.01.2026

Ct. No. 2

adeb

W.P.A. 28126 of 2025

Subhan Ali Molla

Vs.

Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Debasish Kundu

…for the Petitioner

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sinha

Mr. Shaunak Ghosh

…for the UOI

1. Matter is heard in presence of the learned

advocates representing the petitioner and

Union of India.

2. Report is submitted by the Commandant

(Estt) dated 1st January, 2026 along with necessary documents including USG report dated 29th November, 2025 and same are

taken on record.

3. Petitioner participated in the selection process

for being appointed as Constable (GD) under

Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs).

November, 2025 on two grounds petitioner cubitus valgus and gynaecomastia. Petitioner

preferred review and review medical examination was conducted on 1st December, 2025. As per review medical examination report dated 1st December, 2025 petitioner was declared unfit as he was diagnosed with gynaecomastia. However, cubitus valgus was not found to be a valid ground to declare the petitioner unfit in review medical examination.

5. As per report submitted on behalf of respondents it appears that in terms of Clause 11(2) of revised guidelines it is specifically provided gynaecomastia will lead to rejection in the initial medical examination having certain specifications. Ultrasound examination is to be done to rule out whether it is due to fatty tissue or breast tissue. Candidates are to be rejected if found to have breast tissue. Ultrasonography report dated 29th November, 2025 contains findings which are suggestive of gynaecomastia due to bilateral breast subareolar tissues enlargement. As per Clause 11(2) of the revised guidelines a candidate needs to be rejected if found to have breast tissue.

6. Decision has been taken by the medical expert in review medical examination based on Ultrasonography report dated 29th November, 2025.

7. Hence, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.

8. Writ petition stands dismissed.

9. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top