CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J
Suranjan Mandal @ Suranjoy Mandal – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J:
1. Petitioner/accused preferred this Criminal Revisional applicationunder Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘CrPC’), seeking quashing of the proceeding being Spl. P.A. – 10 of 2022 arising out of Itahar P.S. Case No. 304/22 dated16.05.2022 under Sections 341 /323/325/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘ IPC ’) read with Section 3 (1)(r)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short ‘the 1989 Act’) and charge sheet bearing no. 596/2022 dated 31.12.2022 under /323/506/34 of read with (1)(r)(s) of the 1989 Act thereof pending before the Learned Judge, Special Court (POA Act), Raiganj, Uttar Dinajpur.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
2. The brief facts, essential for the purpose of disposal of this Revisional application, are as under: -
a. On the basis of the written complaint lodged by the opposite party no. 2/de facto complainant, an FIR being Itahar P.S. Case No. 304/22 dated 16.05.2022 under Sections 341 /323/ 325/307/506/34 of the IPC read with Section 3 (1)(r)(s) of the 1989 Act has been registered, and investigation has been initiated against the petitioner and another accused.
b. The op
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.