IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

CO 179 of 2024 Sapiur Rahaman

Vs.

Indian Bank

For the Petitioner: Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Advocate

Mr. Ved Rai, Advocate

Mr. Mayank Bhandari, Advocate

Mr. Vivek Saha, Advocate

Heard & Judgment on: January 6, 2026

DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. Revisional application is directed against order dated January 10, 2024

passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Siliguri in T.O.A. No.371 of 2017

arising out of O.A. No.258 of 2015.

2. Revisional application is taken up for final hearing.

3. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the opposite

such proceedings, the secured asset was sold. According to him, the sale

proceeds was in excess of the claim of the opposite party. In fact, a sum was refunded to the opposite party.

4. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, in such circumstances, the claim of the opposite party was satisfied. Be that as it may, he draws the attention of the Court to the impugned order. He submits that, the impugned order in Clause IV restrained the defendant from creating third-party rights in respect of any othe