SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 179

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SAMSAD BANU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 8625 / 2022



06.01.2026 In the High Court at Calcutta

Item no.A/L 171

Court No. 18 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Sc Appellate Side

Case No. WPA 8625 of 2022

In the matter of : Samsad Banu

…. Petitioner

VS.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

….Respondents

For the Petitioner:

Mr. Washef Ali Mondal

….Advocate

For the State:

Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay, Ld. AGP

Ms. Iti Dutta.

….Advocates

For the WBCSSC:

Dr. Sutanu Kumar Patra

Ms. Supriya Dubey.

….Advocates

1.Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on

record.

2.The prayer of the petitioner seeking transfer stood

rejected by the school on the ground that the petitioner

is a single-subject teacher.

3.Reliance has been placed on the judgment delivered by

an Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court on a similar issue on August 8, 2024 in MAT No. 1218 of 2024 with CAN 1 of 2024 (Gokul Chandra Mallick Vs. The State of

West Bengal & Ors.).

4.The Court was of the opinion that the notification relied

upon by the authority for not disposing of the application for transfer of the petitioner casts a duty on the District Inspector of Schools to make arrangement

within a time-bound manner. The Court directed the District Inspector of Schools to consider the application for transfer.

5.By a further order dated July 31, 2025 in FMA No. 995 of 2025 with CAN 1 of 2025 (Rupak Dhua Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.), the Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to observe that the claim for transfer cannot be kept in abeyance till a willing teacher is found. The Court was pleased to direct the District Inspector of Schools to take expeditious steps for filling up the resultant vacancy that might arise after the candidate’s transfer is allowed.

6.In the instant case, it appears that the prayer of the petitioner seeking transfer has been rejected by the school contrary to the government norms.

7.Under such circumstances, the head of the institution is directed to reconsider the petitioner’s application seeking transfer in line with the judgment delivered in the matter of Rupak Dhua (supra) and forward the same to the District Inspector of Schools (SE), South 24 Parganas being the respondent no. 5 herein who shall consider the petitioner’s application for transfer and dispose of the same in accordance with law irrespective of the fact whether any alternative arrangement could be made or not. The resultant vacancy on the transfer of the petitioner shall be filled up in the manner as directed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the matter of Rupak Dhua (supra).

8.The head of the institution shall take steps in the matter positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order and the concerned District Inspector of Schools shall act positively within three months from the date of receipt of all documents from the school authority.

9.The writ petition stands disposed of.

10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top