SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 579

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SUBRATA BISWAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged the orders being nos. 3 and 4 both dated June 25, 2025 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (LA), Nadia in this writ petition.

2. The property of the petitioner being RS Plot no. 312 corresponding to LR plot no. 103, JL No. 53, within Mouza – Simultala, under Police Station – Kotwali in the district of Nadia was acquired vide LA Case No. 117/PHE/0910 under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’, for short). The notice under Section 12(2) of the 1894 Act dated August 22, 2013 was issued and immediately upon receipt of such notice the petitioner by a letter dated August 29, 2013, raised objection against adequacy of the compensation amount determined under the Award. The said written objection was received by the office of the Land Acquisition Collector, Nadia on August 29, 2013. Thereafter a notice dated January 8, 2014 was issued to the petitioner requesting the petitioner to collect the compensation amount from the office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Krishnanagar, Nadia within February 15, 2014 failing which the amount will be deposited in the Treasury. The petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top