January 6, 2026

Sl. No.17

Court No.1

s.biswas

WPCT 247 of 2025

Union of India and others

vs.

Dr. Diganta Kumar Das

Mr. D. N. Roy, Senior Advocate

Ms. Sayani Roy Chowdhury

... for the petitioners

Mr. Ujjal Ray

Mr. Arpa Chakraborty

... for the respondent

Per, Sujoy Paul, A.C.J.

1. Mr. D. N. Roy, learned Senior Advocate for the

petitioners and Mr. Ujjal Ray, learned advocate

for the respondent, are heard on admission.

2. This petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of

the Constitution of India, takes exception to the order of Central Administrative Tribunal dated 30.01.2025 passed in O.A. 350/01550/2023 whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal, Kolkata Bench (Tribunal) allowed the original application and set aside the impugned order

dated 7th November, 2023.

3. The admitted facts between the parties are that

the original applicant/respondent herein previously served with Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). The applicant and one Dr. K. S. Reddy while working with the SSB, were declared as surplus. Thereafter they were given appointment

in the petitioner department.

4. The applicant preferred an application for grant of

benefit of Dynamic Assured Career Progression

(DACP) Scheme by counting services rendered by him