SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 309

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ANIRUDDHA MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN KAMARHATI MUNICIPALITY AND ORS – Respondent


Form No.J(2)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present :

The Hon’ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

WPA 3064 of 2025

Aniruddha Mukherjee

Versus

Chairman, Kamarhati Municipality & ors.

For the petitioners : Mr. Sardar Amjad Ali, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Puranjan Pal

Mr. Samir Kr. Ghosh

For the Municipality : Mr. Sankha Subhra Ray

For the respondent no.2 : Mr. Sagar Bandyopadhyay, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Soma Kar Ghosh Mr. Arabinda Pathak

Ms. Suparna Paul Ms. Shilpi Ghosh

For the State : Ms. Sipra Mazumdar

Ms. Somashree Dey

Heard on : 02.01.2026. Judgment on : 02.01.2026

Raja Basu Chowdhury, J (Oral):

1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, complaining

illegal construction done by the respondent No. 2 pursuant to the

purported building plan sanctioned by the Municipal authorities forming annexure P-3 of the present writ petition.

2. In order to decide on the issues involved in the writ petition, it is necessary to note down the facts leading to the instant case. The petitioner claims to have acquired interest in respect of a property which originally forms part of a property which was held by the predecessor in title of both the petitioner as also the private respondent N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top