SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 348

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
RATAN KARMAKAR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. CHAINA DAS AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Sugato Majumdar

SA/60/2004

IA NO: CAN/1/2008(Old No: CAN/5177/2008),

CAN/5/2025

RATAN KARMAKAR AND ORS.

VS

SMT. CHAINA DAS AND ORS.

For the Appellants : Mr. Dipayan Kundu, Adv.

Mr. Subham Ghosh, Adv.

Mr. Agnik Moulik, Adv.

For the Respondents : Mr. P. R. Mitra, Adv.

Mr. Ashim Kr. Roy, Adv.

Heard on : 06.01.2026 Judgment on : 15.01.2026

Sugato Majumdar, J :

The instant Second Appeal is preferred against the Judgment and Decree

dated August 30, 2003 passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, Fast Tract, 2nd Court, Suri, Birbhum passed in Title Appeal No. 34 of 2001 reversing the

Judgment and Decree dated November 29, 2000 in Title Suit No. 121 of 1995.

The original suit was filed, praying for recovery of possession with other

reliefs. The plaint case, in nutshell, was that the Plaintiffs are owners and the landlords of the suit premises which they purchased in terms of the registered deeds

of sale dated 06/11/1989 and 24/09/1991. Since then the Plaintiffs are in possession of the suit premises. The Defendant was a monthly tenant in respect of the suit premises at a monthly rental of Rs.105/- payabl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top