IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Subhadip Bose – Appellant
Versus
LA Collector, Hooghly, Chinsurah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. res judicata due to prior judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. transition from la act to 2013 act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments concerning sale deed valuation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. issues framed for prior appeals. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusion and disposal of appeals. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
Judgment :
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
1. By a judgment dated May 8, 2025, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, inter alia comprised of one of us (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.), had disposed of two appeals bearing FAT No. 516 of 2019 and FAT No. 3 of 2019, which, we are apprised, have not been interfered with in any further challenge till date and operates as res judicata between the parties thereto.
2. All the present appeals and cross-objections arise from the self-same land acquisition proceeding from which the said previous appeals arose. The arguments advanced by the land losers as well as the State in the previous appeals are adopted in their entirety by both sides in the present appeals. It has been prayed that the instant appeals be also disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in the said earlier appeals. However, for the sake of completion, we narrate the salient features of the
Meherawal Khewaji Trust (Registered), Faridkot and Others v. State of Punjab and Others
Himmat Singh and Others v. State of M.P. and Another
Anjani Molu Dessai v. State of Goa and Another
Ashok Kumar and Others v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.