CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTA CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
SK. ABUL KASEM AND ORS. – Respondent
In the High Court at Calcutta
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
And
The Hon’ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
FMA 1738 of 2025
with
CAN 1 of 2025
SIDDHARTA CHANDRA
VS.
SK. ABUL KASEM & ORS
For the appellant : Mr. Sukumar Bhattacharyya
Ms. Oindrilla Chatterjee
Ms. Puja Sonkar
Ms. Subhangi Bhattacharyya
For the respondent : Mr. Anindya Halder
Mr. Sk. Zubair Ahmed
Mr. Rasidul Islam Molla
Heard on : 13.01.2026 Judgment on : 13.01.2026
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:-
1. In view of arguable questions of fact and law being involved, FMA
1738 of 2025 is admitted to be heard on the grounds taken in the
memorandum of appeal.
2. It is argued by learned counsel for the appellant that the Civil Court
which passed the impugned order under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 did not have jurisdiction, since the dispute
between the parties, as per the averments made in the Section 9 application itself, comes within the ambit of “commercial dispute” as envisaged in the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
3. It is further contended that to the knowledge of the appellant, no steps have been taken by the petitioner/respondent no.1 for reference to arbitration d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.