SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 396

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
RIYA DAS – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF CGST AND CX HEADQUARTER ANTI EVASION UNIT AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

And

The Hon’ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)

MAT 2 of 2026

With

IA No.: CAN 1 of 2026

Riya Das

Vs.

Inspector of CGST & CX, Headquarter, Anti Evasion Unit, Siliguri

Commissionerate & Ors.

For the Appellant : Mr. Mainak Bose, Ld. Sr. Advocate

Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Advocate

Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Advocate

Mr. Deokinandan Sharma, Advocate

Mr. Rituraj Chakraborty, Advocate

Mr. Rajdeep Das, Advocate

For the Respondents : Mr. Ratan Banik, Advocate

Mr. Bishwaraj Agarwal, Advocate

Heard & Judgment on : January 9, 2026

DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. Appeal is at the behest of the writ petitioner and directed against order

dated December 17, 2025 passed in WPA 2021 of 2025.

2. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, the appellant is the owner of the consignment. Consignment is perishable in nature. He refers to the show-cause notice. He submits that, the quantum of penalty that can be imposed in terms of the show-cause notice is Rs.5,23,264/-. Appellant is ready and willing to furnish such amount by way of a security to the authority. He also submits that,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top