CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
CHITTARANJAN BANIK & ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
Appellate Side
Present:
The Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta
C.R.R. 1333 of 2001
With
CRAN 5/2025
Chittaranjan Banik & Ors.
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ujjal Ray, Adv.
Ms. Manishikha Mondal, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Debasish Roy, Ld. PP
Mr. Anand Keshari, Adv.
Ms. Chandreyi Dutta, adv
Heard on : 28-11-2025 Judgment on : 10-12-2025
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J:
1. This Criminal Revisional application has been filed by the four petitioners/convicts under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.P.C.’), challenging the correctness, legality and propriety of the judgment and order dated 24-04-2001 passed by the Learned Sessions Judge, Hooghly in Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 2000.
2. By the aforesaid judgment and order, the Learned Sessions Judge affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21-11-2000 passed by the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Additional Court, Hooghly in Sessions Trial No. 34 of 1999. By the said judgment, the petitioners, namely, Chittaranjan Banik, Bimal Sen @ Mistry, Bhim Biswas and Bijan Biswas were convicted under Section 436 read with Section 34 of IPC and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.