Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
KALYAN DAS @ KALYAN KUMAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
Form No. J(2)
In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Hon’be Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya And The Hon’ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya W.P.L.R.T. 209 of 2025 Sri Sri Dodhimohan Jew represented by its present Seva Puja Committee Vs.
The State of West Bengal and others With W.P.L.R.T. 220 of 2025 Kalyan Das @ Kalyan Kumar Das Vs.
The State of West Bengal and others For the petitioner In both the matters : Mr. Sounak Bhattacharyya Ms. Sangeeta Roy Mr. Chandra Prakash Ms. Monalisa Maity For the State In WPLRT 209 of 2025 : Mr. Sk. Md. Galib Mr. Abu Siddik Mallick For the State In WPLRT 220 of 2025 : Mr. Sk. Md. Galib Mr. Kapil Guha For the respondent no.4 In WPLRT 209 of 2025 & For the respondent no.9 In WPLRT 220 of 2025 : Mr. Ayan Banerjee Ms. Debasree Dhamali Ms. Riya Ghosh Ms. Debolina Ghosh Heard on : 14.01.2026 & 22.01.2026 Judgment on : 22.01.2026 Sabyasachi Bha
Point of Law : In H.P. Big Landed Estate Act, 1953, Section 11 (2) carved out an exception in favour of a minor provided minor had no other means of livelihood.
A deity is a juristic person and can sue as an indigent person under Order 33, Rule 1, CPC. However, a suit instituted by the next friend without obtaining the leave of the court to institute the act....
The validity of a gift deed supersedes subsequent sales; individuals representing deities can sue to recover properties, affirming their legal standing to protect such interests.
The limited rights of a Mohtmim or Shehbit of an idol inside a temple and the need for proper management of temple lands and income.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article