SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 445

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
KANAK BARICK – Appellant
Versus
JANMANJAYA PANDEY ALIAS BOGHA – Respondent


In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present :-

The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and The Hon’ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Case No.

FA 393 of 2025 with CAN 1 of 2025 In the matter of :

SMT. KANAK BARICK & ORS.

…. Appellants VS.

SRI JANMANJAYA PANDEY alias BOGHA & ANR.

….Respondents For the Appellants : Mr. Shyamal Chakraborty Mr. NayanRanjanChakrabarti Mr. SwastikPolley ….Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Debdipto Banerjee Mr. Soumen Banerjee ….Advocates Heard on : 20.01.2026 Judgment on : January 20, 2026.

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. :-

1. As per our previous direction, the appeal is taken up for hearing along with the application.

2. Heard learned learned counsel for the parties.

3. The conspectus of the appeal is short. The learned Trial Judge dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs, inter alia for declaration that the defendant / respondent no.1 is an occupier of the suit room after the death of the original tenant and for further declaration that the occupier has no right to transfer, sublet and / or hand over the suit room to the defendant, and for permanent injunction to that effect.

4. The only premise on which the learned Tri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top