Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS
Sudam Bhowmik – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution case initiation and incident details (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's arguments regarding evidence reliability (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence against the accused (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 4. legal principles regarding evidentiary standards (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. affirmation of conviction and sentencing rationale (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS, J.
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgement and order passed on May 18, 2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. (Fast Track court) in session trial case no. 38/March/2013, under Section 341/326/307 of the Indian Penal Code, whereby the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 326 of the and sentenced him to suffer, regardless imprisonment for seven years for the offence committed under of the with a fine of Rs. 3000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months for the offence under of the.
Fact of the case
2. The prosecution case was launched on the strength of a complaint lodged by one Tushar Kanti Bakshi before the O.C. Beta Police Station on August 19, 2012, a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
