Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
KRISHNA RAO
Debanjan Hazra – Appellant
Versus
Serious Fraud Investigation Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of look out circular and its legal justification. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the look out circular. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. details on the investigation of elder pharmaceuticals. (Para 10 , 12 , 19) |
| 4. court's view on the consequences of evading trial. (Para 25 , 29) |
| 5. final decision on the look out circular. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present writ application challenging the Look Out Circular issued by the respondent no.1 against the petitioner. The petitioner is a chemist by profession. In the year 2006, the petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Manager at Elder Pharmaceuticals Limited and he was continued with the said post till the year 2009. Thereafter the petitioner was employed with Cell Life Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd., Cerberus Venture Pvt. Ltd., AR Printing and Packaging Pvt. Ltd., AR Printpack Ltd. and Stone Sapphire Pvt. Ltd.
2. In the year 2013, the petitioner left India to China to pursue better career opportunities and joined Shanghai Shitai Co. Ltd. and is residing in China. The petitioner got a job at AD Global Limited in 2014 in Shanghai and since then the petitioner is emp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
