SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 666

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PARIMAL CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDRA KUMAR AGARWALA – Respondent


18.02.2026 Item No.8 Ct. No. 34 nb CRR 3546 of 2012 In the matter of: Sri Parimal Chakraborty, ...… petitioner.

Mr. Priyankar Ganguly, Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta, .…For the petitioner.

Ms. Suparna Chatterjee, ….The amicus curie.

1. This revisional application has been filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the judgment and order dated 31.8.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track 6th Court at Alipore in Criminal Appeal no.44 of 2006 arising out of Judgment and conviction and order of sentence dated July 31, 2006 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore in connection with the complaint case no.1934 /2000 under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. 2. The fact of the case in a nutshell is that, the petitioner was arraigned an accused in connection with the complaint case registered being registered under Section 138 of the N.I. Act filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore alleging, inter alia that the accused/petitioner received an excess amount of Rs.1,00,984/- in order to pay back the said amount arising out of the transaction and the petitioner had issued an account payee cheque of Rs.1 lac vide no.128546 drawn o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top