SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 970

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BIDYUT GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 27885 / 2023



16th Feb., 2026 In the High Court at Calcutta Item no.D/L 50 Court No. 18 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)

Appellate Side Case No. WPA 27885 of 2023 In the matter of : Bidyut Ghosh …. Petitioner VS.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

….Respondents For the Petitioner:

Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri Mr. Ankan Mondal ….Advocates For the WBBSE:

Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya Mr. Bibek Datta Mr. Manas Bhattacharyya ….Advocates

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

2. The petitioner’s application seeking transfer stood returned by the District Inspector of Schools on 7th September, 2021 on the ground that the petitioner is a single subject teacher.

3. The petitioner presses for transfer.

4. It appears that considerable period of time has elapsed from the day the application of the petitioner for transfer stood rejected. Staff strength may have changed in the meantime.

observation that it will be open for the petitioner to make fresh application offline seeking transfer in the prescribed format disclosing ground for the same.

6. In the event such an application is made, the same shall be considered by the head of the institution in accordance with the prevailing transfer rules and law laid down by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court on 31st July, 2025 in the matter of Rupak Dhua Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. [FMA 995 of 2025 with IA No.: CAN 1 of 2025] wherein the Court took note of the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 amending the West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015.

7. The Court was of the opinion that the aforesaid notification states that it would be an obligation on the part of the District Inspector of Schools (SE) to take urgent steps in a time bound manner to search for a teacher on the same subject from nearby schools and make local arrangement so that the teacher of the other school attends the school wherefrom the single teacher had applied for transfer. The petitioner’s claim for transfer cannot be kept in abeyance till a willing teacher is found. The Court was pleased to direct the District Inspector of Schools to take expeditious steps for filling up the resultant vacancy that might arise after the candidate’s transfer is allowed.

8. A decision shall be taken at the earliest but positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the application.

9. The ground of single subject teacher cannot be relied upon by the authority to reject the prayer of the petitioner.

10. The fate of the petitioner’s application shall be made known to the petitioner.

11. Suspension of the Utsashree portal shall not stand in the way of the respondents in taking steps in terms of the order passed hereinabove.

13. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top