SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 1421

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
AMITAVA HAZRA AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 23913 / 2024



13th Jan. 2026 In the High Court at Calcutta Item no.6 Subrata Bhattacharyya Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction AR(C)

Appellate Side Case No. WPA No.23913 of 2024 In the matter of :

Amitava Hazra & Anr.

…. Petitioners VS.

State of West Bengal & Ors.

….Respondents For the Petitioners:

Mr. Ashis Kumar Paul ….Advocate For the State:

Mr. Sudipto Panda Mr. Soumik Dey ….Advocate

1.Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

2.The issue to be decided in the present writ petition is whether an employee will be entitled to receive pension on and from the date following retirement or from the date of refund of the employer’s share of contribution.

3.The father of the petitioners retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31st August, 1998 and died on 3rd August 2016.

4.In response to the notification published by the School Education Department being No. 749-SE(L)/SL/5S- 56/13(Pt-V) dated 13th June, 2014 issued in compliance of the direction passed by the Hon’ble Special Bench of this Court in the judgment dated 16th July, 2013 in the matter of District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Kolkata Vs. Abhijit Baidya, the father of the petitioners exercised option to switch over from CPF to GPF and refunded the employer’s share of contribution with interest and additional interest on 22nd August 2014 and 6th January 2015.

5.Pension Payment Order was issued in favour of the father of the petitioners with effect from the date of refund of the employer’s share of contribution.

6.The petitioners claim that pension ought to have been released on and from the next date of retirement of the father of the petitioners and not from the date of refund of the employer’s share of contribution.

7.A similar issue has been decided by this Court in WPA

964 of 2022 in the matter of Sitala Mandal (Chaudhuri)

Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.

8.The judgment passed in the aforesaid matter on 8th February, 2022 will cover the present writ petition.

9.As the teacher died in the meantime, accordingly, the revised pension payment order is required to be issued in favour of the widow of the deceased employee.

10. The instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Director of Pension, Provident Fund & Group Insurance, District Inspector of Schools (SE), Purba Bardhaman and the concerned Treasury Officer to verify the records, and in the event, it is found that the father of the petitioners exercised option and refunded the employer’s share of contribution within the time specified in the notification dated 13th June, 2014, then steps shall be taken to issue Revised Pension Payment Order in favour of the heirs and legal representatives with effect from the date following the date of retirement on superannuation and to release the pension in

11. Steps shall be taken in the matter at the earliest but positively within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order. All payments shall positively be released immediately upon issuance of the

12. The writ petition stands disposed of.

13. Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

[Amrita Sinha, J]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top