SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 1964

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
DHANAPATI ROY AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS. – Respondent


S/L 11

23.03.2026 Court No.18 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 10921 of 2025 Dhanapati Roy & Anr.

Vs.

The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission & Ors.

Mr. Debasish Kundu Mr. Sayan Mukherjee Mr. Bidan Modak … for the Petitioners.

Ms. Sunita Sarkar … for the Union of India.

1. The petitioners participated for appointment as Constable (GD) in CAPF. Though they cleared all stages of the recruitment examination-2024, their names have been published in the list of withheld candidates by the Staff Selection Commission due to pendency of Court case.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the same.

3. It has been submitted that the appeal was preferred long back and no steps have been taken by the authority to get the appeal heard. Because of the pendency of the appeal, the petitioners are not being provided appointment. They are losing their monthly salary as well as their seniority in service.

4. Prayer has been made to direct the authority to appoint the petitioners in their respective job.

5. Learned advocate for the respondents relies on the report prepared by the Commandant at the office of the Inspector General of Police, Salt Lake. In paragraph 3 of the report

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top