20.01.2026 Item no.07.

Ct. No.15 Suman WPA 20244 of 2025 Rahila Bibi and Ors.

-vs-

The State of West Bengal and Ors.

Ms. Reshmi Khatun ..for the petitioner Mr. Ziaul Haque ..for respondent nos. 10 to 13.

The petitioner alleges unauthorized construction at the behest of respondent nos. 10 to

13.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of a civil suit between the parties and in violation of an injunction order passed therein, respondent nos. 10 to 13 carried out unauthorized construction without obtaining permission from the Panchayat Authority.

It is further submitted by learned counsel for respondent nos.10 to 13 that respondent no.13 has not undertaken any unauthorized construction and possesses a sanctioned plan for his building. However, no sanctioned plan could be produced in respect of the construction allegedly carried out by respondent nos. 10 to 12.

As in several other cases, the petitioner has approached this Court only after completion of the construction. This fact is evident from the photograph appearing at page 38 of the writ petition, which clearly indicates that even the roof of the building had been completed prior to the filing of the