SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2373

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DEVI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 23835 / 2025



10.02.2026 Ct. No. 30 SL No.20 MKP WPA 23835 of 2025 Chandra Devi And Anr Vs.

The State Of West Bengal And Ors Mr. Shambhu Kumar Choudhary (in-Person)

………………for the Petitioner Mr. Biplab Guha Mr. Jaladhi Das ……for the State

1. The writ application has been preferred challenging an order dated 04.06.2025, passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Paschim Bardhaman, being the Respondent no.2 herein.

2. Both parties have filed their short notes and it is the petitioner’s case that the petitioner is an owner of a commercial goods vehicle bearing No.WB-23B-8166, registered at ARTO Barrackpore (KMA area). It completed its 15th year on February 18, 2025. That due to a 2012 ban on 15+ year-old commercial vehicles in the Kolkata Metropolitan Area (KMA), the VAHAN portal was locked, preventing the petitioner from paying the Certificate of Fitness (CF) fees.

3. The petitioner has approached the High Court on earlier occasions, when his case was directed to be considered by the Authorities concerned, who have from time to time passed similar orders and finally the impugned order rejecting the petitioner’s prayer.

4. The petitioner now submits that the impunged order was passed on 11th August, 2025 and On November 17, 2025, the Government of West Bengal issued a landmark notification as per which commercial vehicles older than 15 years are now eligible for CF renewal and permit extensions as per new Mandatory Testing i.e *KMA Vehicles (like WB-23B-8166): Must undergo fitness checks bi-annually (every 6 months) and Non-KMA Vehicles: Must undergo checks annually,etc.

5. That the notification specifically ordered the NIC to update the VAHAN software to allow these transactions.

6. It is thus submitted, the grounds for the August 2025 rejection (impugned order) no longer exist. The State’s new policy (Nov 2025)

explicitly allows what the petitioner is seeking.

7. That denying the CF renewal under these new rules violates the petitioner’s Right to Livelihood (Article 21).

8. It is further stated that the notification 5304-

WT (17.11.2025) is the primary legal authority for Renewal of CF and as such, the order dated

11.08.2025 shows the previous rejection was purely technical/portal-based.

9. The petitioner states that he now squarely falls under the new State policy i.e Notification No.5304-WT dated 17.11.2025. Para 1(b) of the policy mandates bi-annual (6-month) CF checks for KMA-registered vehicles.

10. Para 4 of the Notification No.5304-WT/TPT-

18011/25/2025, dated 17.11.2025 expressly directs the Director of IT, NIC, to update the VAHAN software to allow these renewals.

11. The Learned Counsel for the State/Respondent has also filed written notes wherein, it is stated that prior to this instant petition, two other writ petitions being No.WPA 7199 of 2025 (Chandra Devi Chowdhuri-Vs.-State of West Bengal and Others) and WPA No.13654 of 2025 (Smt.Chandra Devi Chaudhury and Others – Vs.-State of West Bengal and Others) were preferred. The cruxe of the cases was whether permit granted in favour of a commercial vehicle being No.WB 23138166 remains valid after a specified period of 15 years or not.

12. This writ petition is nothing but the repetition of earlier events and as such the same is not tenable, in as much as the decision has already been taken by this Hon’ble Court by different benches.

13. Admittedly, the petitioner’s prayer for renewal of his 15 year old vehicle has been considered and rejected by the Authority concerned in compliance of the direction of the High Court.

14. The last such order has been passed on

11.08.2025, the Learned Counsel for the petitioner has placed the notification No.5304- WT dated 17.11.2025 wherein, it appears that the Government of West Bengal, has taken into consideration, the ban applying to vehicles beyond 15 years of age and has issued the said notification wherein, it has been noted as follows:

“In view of the writ petitions as stated above having self same cause of action this Hon'ble High Court pleased to direct the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top