SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2911

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BRIDGE AND ROOF COMPANY (INDIA) LTD. AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) KOL. AND CONTROLLIGN AUTHORITY AND ANR. – Respondent


24.04.2026 Item No.1 Court No. 30 Piya WPA 8484 of 2026 Bridge and Roof Company (India) Ltd. &

Anr. -vs-

The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Kolkata and Controlling Authority & Anr.

Mr. Soumya Majumder, Ld. Sr. Adv.

Mr. Sudarshan Kr. Agarwal Ms. Ditsha Dhar Ms. Debanjana Paul Mr. Sakshi Singh … for the Petitioner Mr. Balai Ch. Paul Ms. Tithi Roy …. For the Respondents

1. The writ application has been preferred challenging the certificate dated 18th February, 2026 issued by the respondent no. 1 being the controlling authority herein, in file no. 48/06/2022-E3 and has prayed for quashing of the same along with an order dated 18th August, 2025 also issued by the respondent no. 1 the controlling authority.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent herein submits that the said order dated 18th August, 2025 is an appealable order. But as no appeal has been preferred by the petitioners till date, the same is barred by limitation and the period of limitation cannot be extended beyond the permissible limit as provided in the statute in the present case under Section 7(7) of the payment of gratuity act.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent has relied upon the following judgments:-

i. City Coll

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top