SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 205

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
M/s. Diamond Silk Khadi Society & Anr. - Appellant
Vs.
Employees’ State Insurance Corporation & Ors. - Respondent
WPA 21943 of 2025
Decided On : 27-04-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Victor Chatterjee, Mr. P. Nath, Ms. S. Bhattacharya.
For the Respondent/ESI: Mr. Mihir Kundu.

Payments termed as 'allowances' from which provident fund is deducted, absent variable performance-based criteria, constitute basic wages. Establishments cannot circumvent social security obligations by artificially segmenting payroll records to misrepresent the total number of employees or the nature of their remuneration.

Headnote:(A) Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9), 2(22), 45-A and 45-AA - Establishment coverage and wage components - Determination of statutory threshold - Payments structured as 'allowances' from which social security contributions are deducted, devoid of variable performance-based criteria, constitute basic wages under the definition of ‘wages’. (Paras 24, 26, 33, 35, 36)

(B) Appeals - Scope and Ambit - Courts shall not interfere with findings of fact by authorities where the establishment intentionally splits payroll records to circumvent social security coverage; such acts provide grounds for upholding the decision of the lower authorities. (Paras 38, 39)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged orders passed by social welfare authorities under the relevant insurance statute, contending that the establishment did not engage 10 or more persons and that its workers were self-employed artisans in the unorganized sector. The authorities had initiated proceedings based on an inspection report documenting 13 total personnel, including those categorized under 'allowance' heads, and determined the establishment was liable for registration and contribution.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the establishment maintained payroll records in separate segments to artificially segregate employees. Since provident fund contributions were deducted from the 'allowances' paid to these employees, the court held that these payments were camouflaged basic wages rather than variable performance incentives. Consequently, the threshold for mandatory coverage was met.

Issues: The main issues were whether the establishment fell within the statutory threshold of 10 or more employees and whether portions of salary labeled as 'allowances' should be included in the calculation of statutory wages.

Ratio Decidendi: Payments, though labeled as allowances, are considered statutory wages if they are not linked to specific variable work output and demonstrate a standard wage structure subject to provident fund deductions. An establishment cannot artificially reorganize its registers to segment employees and evade its social security obligations where evidence indicates total engagement meets the statutory headcount.

Result: Petition dismissed; orders upheld.

Table of Content
1. establishment details and the nature of the entity's operations under kvic guidelines. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. petitioner's defense: non-applicability of the esi act due to the nature of artisans as self-employed individuals. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
3. respondent's justification for esi coverage based on the inspection report and employee count. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
4. judicial assessment of wage components ('allowances') and legal status of artisans regarding esi coverage. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
5. determination that establishment qualifies for esi coverage and dismissal of the writ application. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)

Judgment :

SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.

1. The writ application has been preferred against an orders dated 02.05.2022 and 07.01.2025 passed under Section 45-A and 45-AA of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

2. The respondent no.1 is a body corporate constituted under the provisions of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation Act, 1948. The respondent no.2 to 4 are officers discharging duties under the respondent no. 1.

3. The petitioner states that it abides by the "Bye-laws" as provided by the Khadi and Poly Vastra Artisan Welfare and Pension Trust (in short AWFT) KVIC, MSME Government of India. KVIC in its meeting No. 493 dated 29/30.6.1999 resolved in consideration of the resolution to set up Khadi and Poly Vastra Artisan Welfare and Pension Trust, that is, AWFT (Artisan Welfare Fund Trust). It implies that all certified Khadi institutions are to be a member of the said Trust. A Circular was issued on 06.02.2003 for the formation of Khadi and Polyvastra Artisans Welfare and Pension trust state wise in India.

4. The petitioner states that the draft deed of the proposed Trust has been finalized in consultation with the Directorate of Legal Affairs for adherence. The “ARTISAN WELFARE FUND TRUST” was formed as per the deed, with "Bye-laws" that were implemented state wise in India. Thus, the "Bye-laws" of Khadi and Polyvastra Artisans Welfare and Pension Trust came into existence, and the objective is to create a welfare fund for the benefit of the artisans who are "self-employed".

5. It is further stated that the KVIC, MSME, Government of India, issued Guidelines on 19.5.2003, for the operation of the state level 'Artisan Welfare Trust fund', to facilitate the artisans to make their livelihood in accordance with the 'cost chart' prescribed by the Central Certification Committee of KVIC. As per the guidelines, Khadi institutions are required to make contribution for the welfare benefit of the artisans.

6. The petitioner no.1 is a certified 'KHADI MARK' institution and is authorized to use Khadi Mark 'tags and labels' as governed by the Khadi Mark Regulations, 2013. KVIC provides certain exemptions to certified Khadi institution using Khadi Mark registrations. 'Khadi Mark' registration process involves an application that is scrutinized by a committee and verified by accredited agencies to confirm adherence to hand spinning and hand weaving.. 'Khadi' is a hand-spun and hand- woven natural fiber cloth primarily made from cotton, silk and wool. Handspun Yarn is made manually on a spinning wheel (charkha) and the handspun yarn is woven on a handloom by artisans. The word "handloom" has been defined in section 2(d) of the Khadi and Village Industries Commission Act, 1956 which defines "khadi" as any cloth woven on handlooms in India from cotton, silk, or woolen yarn handspun in India or from a mixture of any two or all such yarns. Therefore, the petitioner no.1 does not fall within the meaning of factory and the ESI Act, 1948 does not ipso facto apply to the petitioner no.1 establishment.

7. The petitioner is a certified "KHADI" institution which works under the framework of KVIC, MSME, Government of India. The KVIC Act 1956, is framed to design, govern, guideline and mandate those involved in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top