SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3118

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PARBATI GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


Ct. No.4 D/L 27.04.2026 (Naba) 21 W.P.S.T. 131 of 2025 Smt. Parbati Ghosh Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Sujit Kr. Rath, Mr. Sukumar Sarkar, Mr. Dwijadas Pattanayak ...for the Petitioner Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, ld. AGP, Ms. Sangeeta Roy ...for the State

1. Heard the learned advocate for the writ petitioner as well as the learned A.G.P. representing the State.

2. The petitioner, a retired Staff Nurse, approached the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal (‘Tribunal’ for short) by filing an Original Application. The O.A. No. 374 of 2024 was filed claiming an interest @ 18% per annum on delayed payment of retiral dues. The Tribunal, considering the facts emerging before it, was of the view that the payments were not delayed inordinately and there was no mala fide intention of the respondents apparent from the records. The delay of about two years in sanction of the retiral dues was viewed keeping in background the fact that the petitioner submitted pension papers in June 2020, at a time when Covid-19 pandemic restrictions had already been put in place. The authorities, therefore, were not held liable for grant of any interest.

3. The learned advocate for the writ petitioner submi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top