IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present:-

HON’BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS).

CRA 501 of 2005 RAM CHANDRA DAS & ANR.

VS.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL With CRA 101 OF 2005 AVIJIT SAHA & ANR.

VS.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL For the Appellants : Mr. Santanu Talukdar, Adv.

For the State : Ms. Faria Hossain, Ld. A.P.P., Mr. Anand Keshari, Adv.

Last heard on : 07.11.2025 Judgement on : 07.11.2025 Uploaded on : 10.11.2025 CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J. :-

1. The instant criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the appellants against the judgment and order of conviction dated 25^th January, 2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Court-2, Kalyani, Nadia whereby the order of conviction is passed under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence punishable under Section 399 of the Indian Penal Code and three years for the offence punishable under Section 402 of the Indian Penal Code.

Brief resume of the case

2. The genesis of this criminal case embedded on the strength of the complaint lodged by the S.I., Kalyani P.S. on 23rd January, 2004 before the O.C., Kalyani P.S. when he produced five accused persons, namely, (1) Ram Chandra Das (2) Raju Das @ Saha @ Susanta Saha @ Chaina (3) Paltu Sarkar (4) Abhijit Saha and (5) Bappa Das along with some deadly weapons. It was alleged that the complainant along with some other police persons on receiving information that some miscreants have assembled at Bijoynagar, a lonely place near Railway line (up & down main line) with deadly weapons to commit dacoity in a closed factory under Kalyani Industrial Estate ,rushed there at around 22.45 hrs. and reached near R.T.C. and left their vehicle and reached Bijoynagar on walking. They found some young men sitting in an isolated place and gossiping in a low voice and they rounded them and disclosed their identity and asked them to surrender before them then those said young men disclosed their identity as described hereinabove. After that, the complainant searched their persons and on search, recovered one iron chopper from the possession of Ram Chandra Das, one iron chopper from the possession of Raju Das @ Saha, one iron made Sidkati from the possession of Partha Sarkar, one iron rod about 3 ½” from the possession of Abhijit Saha and one iron rod about 3” from the possession of Bappa Das. Those persons failed to give any satisfactory explanation regarding possession of such weapons and also failed to give any appropriate reply regarding their presence on the spot at that point of time. It was further mentioned in the written complaint that on interrogation, those persons confessed their guilt and stated that they assembled there with weapons to commit dacoity in the locality and other places.

3. On the basis of such complaint, Kalyani P.S. Case No.19 dated 23rd January, 2004 under Sections 399/402 I.P.C. started and after completion of investigation, the charge-sheet was submitted. The case was transferred on commitment before the learned District Judge, Nadia, subsequently, transferred to the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Tract, Court-2, Kalyani, Nadia for trial. The learned Court framed the charges under Sections 399 and 402 against all the accused persons and the content of the charge was read over and explained to them to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Hence, the trial commenced.

Submissions

4. The learned Advocate representing the appellant initially submitted that the learned Court passed the order of conviction without considering the discrepancies in the evidences adduced by the prosecution witnesses. It is his specific contention that the complaint was lodged on 23^rd January, 2004 by the S.I., Kalyani P.S. and he seized offending weapons from each of the accused persons which were five in numbers. No independent witness was there who was pr