SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 8032

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
M/S VISHWAMITRA RAMKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
M/S VESTA TIME COMPANY – Respondent


19.8. 2025 item No.42 n.b.

ct. no. 24 C.O. 2665 of 2025 M/s. Vishwamitra Ramkumar Vs.

M/s. Vesta Time Company.

Mr. Lutful Haque, Ms. Taharima Khatun ….. for the petitioner.

Mr. Ayan Banerjee, Ms. Debaree Dhamali, Ms. Riya Ghosh, …… for the State respondent.

This is second ground of litigation initiated by the petitioner before this Court.

To understand that the issue involved herein, the brief fact is required to be narrated.

Petitioner being the landlord filed a suit for eviction under Section 13(1)(f) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. The said proceeding went up the Hon’ble Supreme Court wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has decreed the suit directing the Trial Court to pass the formal decree, so, that the landlord be given Khas possession for building and re-building, thereafter, after completion of building the tenant may put in possession in terms of the Section 18A of the said Act, 1956.

Consequently, the Trial Court passed a decree favouring both the landlord and tenant and fixed the date for vacation of the building by the tenants and completion of building by the landlord and again directed the landlord to give possession to the tenants within the stipulated period o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top