SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 8166

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
TARAK NATH BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
PRANTOSH KUMAR SAHA – Respondent


16.01.2026 Item No.1 Ct. No. 30 Aloke CO 141 of 2022 Tarak Nath Banerjee Vs Prantosh Kumar Saha Mr. Prantick Ghosh Ms. Poulomi Saha Ms. Shravani Ghosh … for the petitioner Mr. Tarak Nath Halder … for the opposite party

1. The revisional application has been preferred against an order dated 10.12.2021, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Sealdah, South 24 Parganas, in Ejectment Suit No. 62 of 2011, allowing the application under Section 7(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, filed by the plaintiff/opposite party.

2. Vide the order under challenge, the trial Court held as follows:-

“……..On perusal of the record, it appears that this Court had disposed of the application under Section 7(2) of the WBPT Act, 1997 vide order dated 24.07.2014 with the observation that there are no arrears of rent. In such a situation, the contention of the plaintiff that the defendant has not paid arrears of rent does not hold good. However, as per Section 7(1)(c) of the WBPT Act, 1997, the tenant shall continue to pay to the landlord or deposit with the Civil Judge month by month by the 15th of each succeeding month, a sum equivalent to the rent. In the instant suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top