SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 8337

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
JIMUT MANDAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 17585 / 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sk. Sahjahan Ali

A teacher is entitled to a higher pay scale upon acquiring a higher academic qualification in a relevant subject, provided prior permission is obtained from the school's managing authority; once such permission is secured, additional administrative approval is not a statutory prerequisite for qualification-based pay benefits.

Headnote:(A) Education Law - State Legislation - Higher scale of pay - Entitlement - Requirement of prior permission - Competent authority - A teacher appointed in a graduate category is entitled to a higher scale of pay upon acquiring a postgraduate degree if prior permission was granted by the management body of the institution. Absence of an explicit statutory requirement for further approval from regional inspection authorities means the committee’s resolution is sufficient to satisfy procedural mandates for qualification enhancement. (Paras 6, 8, 9)

(B) Service Law - Benefit of higher pay scale - Procedural propriety - Where a teacher improves academic qualifications in a subject relevant to the post held and obtains requisite permission from the management, the regional administrative body cannot arbitrarily deny the benefit of the higher scale of pay. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a teacher, sought to enhance qualifications through correspondence, securing formal permission from the school's managing body beforehand. After completion, the application for a higher pay scale was rejected by the administrative inspector. The petitioner challenged this decision, citing precedents where identical claims were upheld.

Findings of Court:
The regional inspector lacks legal justification to deny the pay scale improvement where the primary procedural requirement of seeking and receiving prior permission from the school management has been satisfied. The refusal was set aside as being inconsistent with established jurisprudence.

Issues: Whether higher pay scales can be denied to a teacher who obtained a higher degree in a relevant subject after receiving prior approval from the institution's managing body.

Ratio Decidendi: Once a teacher secures the mandated prior approval from the competent governing body for academic advancement, that approval suffices for entitlement to a higher pay scale in the absence of a specific statutory override requiring additional authorizations.

Result: Writ petition allowed; impugned order set aside; directions issued to provide pay benefits with arrears.

Despite service, State is unrepresented.

The present writ petition challenges the legality and validity of the order passed by the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Murshidabad, whereby the petitioner’s prayer for a higher scale of pay was rejected. The petitioner further seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the higher scale of pay along with all consequential benefits thereto.

Before delving into the issues raised in the present writ petition, it would be appropriate to set out the essential facts that have led to its institution.

The petitioner joined Rukanpur High School (H.S.) (hereinafter referred to as “the said school”) as an Assistant Teacher in Mathematics in the Honours and Postgraduate Scale on 18th March, 2006. Subsequently, the petitioner submitted a representation to the Secretary of the Managing Committee, through the Headmaster of the school, seeking permission to pursue an M.Sc. degree in Mathematics through a correspondence course offered by Netaji Subhas Open University, without disrupting the regular functioning of the school.

Upon receipt of the petitioner’s application, the Managing Committee adopted a resolution granting him permission to pursue the M.Sc. degree in Mathematics from Netaji Subhas Open University. In due course, the petitioner successfully completed the said course and obtained his Master’s degree in Mathematics. Thereafter, he submitted an application for grant of higher scale of pay through the proper channel, which was duly forwarded to the District Inspector of Schools for necessary action.

However, despite receipt of the said application, no effective steps were taken by the concerned authority. Consequently, the petitioner was constrained to file a writ petition, being WPA 22406 of 2019, which was disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench with a direction to the District Inspector of Schools to pass a reasoned and speaking order after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The Court further directed that the said order be communicated to the petitioner within the time frame specified therein.

Pursuant to the said direction, a hearing was conducted by the District Inspector of Schools on 9th March, 2021. However, by an order dated 9th August, 2021, the District Inspector of Schools rejected the petitioner’s prayer for grant of higher scale of pay. The present writ petition has, therefore, been filed to challenge and assail the said order dated 9th August, 2021.

Mr. Ali, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner joined the said school in the year 2006, i.e., after the promulgation of the West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 2005"). He submits that Section 14(3) of the said Act provides that every teacher of a school, if appointed in the Honours Graduate or Postgraduate scale of pay, shall be entitled to claim additional increments and/or a higher scale of pay upon acquiring a Postgraduate degree or any higher diploma/degree, in the manner as may be specified by order.

Subsequently, an order bearing No. 1595/SE (S) dated 26th December, 2005 was issued by the competent authority. Clause (c) of the said order clarified that any teacher intending to claim the benefit of a higher scale of pay upon improvement of academic qualifications must obtain prior permission from the competent authority before pursuing such enhancement of qualification.

He further submits that another order, bearing No. 593-SE(B) dated 27th November, 2007, was issued by the School Education Department. The said order clarified that, in the case of a teacher appointed in the Honours category, the Managing Committee of the school shall be the competent authority to grant permission for improvement of academic qualification.

Mr. Ali further draws attention to another order dated 19th May, 2014, from which it is also evident that the Managing Committee is the competent authority to grant pri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top