SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 8647

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SUVASISH DASGUPTA – Appellant
Versus
UCO BANK AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONsTITUTIONAL wRIT JURIsDICTION Present :

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE WPO 211 of 2021 SUVASISH DASGUPTA Vs.

UCO BANK & ORS.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumya Majumder, Sr. Adv., Mr. Mainak Ganguly, Adv. Ms. Ledia Dasgupta, Adv.

..... Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Soumen Das Mr. Sourjya Roy, ….. Advocates Heard on : 31st July, 2025 Judgment on : 13th August, 2025 Arindam Mukherjee, J:

Facts of the Case:

1. The petitioner while working as Assistant General Manager, Compliance Department, Head Office, Kolkata of UCO Bank was served with a suspension order dated 15th December, 2017 said to be issued by the General Manager, HRM & OL being the competent authority under the provisions of Regulation 12 of UCO Bank Officer Employees’ (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Regulation). The suspension was with immediate effect. The petitioner thereafter was served with a memo dated 9th November, 2018 informing the petitioner that the respondent-bank proposed to hold an enquiry against the petitioner under the provisions of the said Regulation. The statement of allegations at page 31 of the writ petition on which enqu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top