SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 8682

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SAHIDUL ISLAM AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
UDAY CHAKRABORTY AND ORS – Respondent


AD-88 Ct No.16

22.05.2025 TN FMAT 154 of 2025 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025 Sahidul Islam and others Vs.

Sri Uday Chakraborty and others Mr. Arnab Roy, Mr. Satyam Mukherjee, Mr. Purnendu Shekhar Ghosh ….for the appellants

1. The present appeal has been preferred against an order refusing ad interim injunction at the behest of the plaintiffs/appellants.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that previously a partition suit was filed by the appellants, in which temporary injunction was refused by the learned Trial Judge. Having come up in appeal against the said order, this Court disposed of the said appeal, bearing FMA 592 of 2015, thereby directing the parties to maintain status quo as regards the nature and character of the suit property till disposal of the partition suit as well as restraining both the parties from raising any construction and/or further construction over the suit property and/or from changing the nature and character thereof till disposal of the suit.

3. The parties were also directed to maintain status quo with regard to their possession in the suit property till the disposal of the suit.

4. Thereafter, learned counsel for the appellants submits, the records of the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top