SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 8871

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ANWESHA CHOWDHURY – Appellant
Versus
DIPANJAN CHOWDHURY – Respondent
CO 1812 / 2025



20.01.2026 Item No.27 Court No. 30 Piya CO 1812 of 2025 Anwesha Chowdhury -vs-

Dipanjan Chowdhury Mr. Satyam Mukherjee, Ms. Sayani Ahmed, Mr. Purnendu Shekhar Ghosh Mr. Saibal Rakshit … for the Petitioner Mr. Niladri Saha Mr. Subhajit Seth …for the Opposite Party

1. The revisional application has been preferred by the wife/petitioner praying for transfer of Matrimonial Suit no. 849 of 2024 from the Court of learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas to the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Chandannagore, Hooghly.

2. On hearing the learned counsels for the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, it appears that the Mat. Suit has been filed in the Barrackpore Court at North 24 Parganas by the husband/opposite party herein.

3. The petitioner/wife herein resides at Chandannagore, Hooghly along with her child aged 2 years.

4. Considering the said difficulty of the petitioner to travel to the Barrackpore Court, North 24 Parganas on regular basis, when she has a child to look after, this Court relying upon the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Umesh Kumar Sharma-vs- State of Uttarakhand & Ors., in Transfer Petition (Crl.) Nos. 534- 536 of 2019, (Para 17 to 22), and Tejalben vs Mihirbhai Bharatbhai Kothari on 11.01.2016, (2016) 3 SCC 69, directs that matrimonial suit being 849 of 2024 be withdrawn from the Court of learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas and be transferred to the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Chandannagore, Hooghly.

5. Learned Additional District Judge, Chandannagore, Hooghly shall proceed with the suit in accordance with law with due notice upon both the parties, expeditiously.

6. Keeping in mind the case of the husband/opposite party herein, the learned District Judge shall be at liberty to permit the husband/opposite party to appear virtually, if the opposite party makes such prayer.

7. CO 1812 of 2025 is disposed of.

8. Parties to act on the server copy of this order.

9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Courts for immediate compliance.

( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top