SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 9182

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SADIK HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR – Respondent


09.09.2025 DL-9 CRR 1269 of 2025 Court No.26 (AD)

In Re.: An application under Section 528 read with Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Sadik Hussain & Anr.

… …petitioners Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra, Advocate Ms. Madhurai Sinha, Advocate Ms. Upasana Banerjee, Advocate … for the petitioners Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP Ms. Sanjana Saha, Advocate … for the State

1. Revisional application is directed against the order dated February 20, 2025 by which, the learned jurisdictional Court cancelled interim bail granted to the petitioners on February

6, 2025.

2. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, all provisions of law under which, the charge sheet submitted were present in the First Information Report in the sense that, the last prayer for addition of provisions of Section 317(4) of the BNS was allowed on January 13, 2025. Therefore, on February 6, 2025 when the interim bail was granted, all provisions of BNS under which, the investigations were done, were available to the police. Filing of a charge sheet, therefore, on February 13, 2025 did not alter the situation.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top