IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE PRESENT:

THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE CRR 2327 of 2018 Dr. Ravi Ganesh Bharadwaj & Anr.

Vs.

Ranjit Sarkar For the petitioners : Mr. Milon Mukherjee Mr. Biswajit Manna For the opposite party in person : Mr. Ranjit Sarkar Heard on : 31.07.2025 Judgment on : 17.09.2025 Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.

1. The petitioners herein have challenged the proceeding being complaint case no.2 of 2017 under section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, pending before learned judicial Magistrate 4th Court, Barrackpore, and have prayed for quashment of the same.

2. The aforesaid complaint case no. 2 of 2017 was initiated on the basis of the petition of complaint filed by opposite party herein interalia alleging commission of offence of causing death by negligence. The allegations levelled in the said complaint are interalia to the effect that on 10.07.2014 at about 4 p.m., the victim who was the son of the complainant /opposite party slipped and fell down on the stair case of his residence, as a result of which he developed severe pain in his abdomen and lower back. Considering the intensity of pain, he was admitted in the emergency department of ILS hospital (accused no.1) at about 6:28 p.m., when victims condition was stable. It is alleged that inspite of victims complain of abdominal tenderness and low back pain, the attending physician did not recommend any investigation of the abdomen. In the X-ray plate nothing remarkable was noticed except mild anterior wedging of D11 and D12 vertebral bodies but the attending doctors ignored the likelihood of damage and the impact to the adjoining upper abdominal organs of the fracture site like kidney renal vain, renal arteries, Adrenal gland etc. On the same day at about 7.p.m. the petitioner no.1 herein advised only CT scan and MRI of Dorso Lumbers Spine to examine only the bodily injury in the vertebral column but completely ignored the patient’s complain regarding pain in the abdomen. It is further alleged that there is absolutely no record of any medical management of any kind, not even a record of the ‘vital signs’ such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration rate etc. of the patient between the time of admission at 7 p.m., on 10.07.2014 and 8.30 a.m. on 11.07.2014. The condition of the patient went bad to worse towards all through the night, as he developed severe abdominal pain but the patient was not examined or treated by any doctor or nurse for the next nine hours and the next examination of the victim Indrajit was conducted only at 6.25 P.M. on 11.07.2014. It is alleged that due to the gross rash and negligent act of the doctors, victim succumbed to death on 12.08.2014 at 7:05 p.m. Thereafter the petitioners issued a vague and unlawful death certificate issued by the petitioner no.4, who was not the attending physician involved with the treatment of the victim. However, in the said death certificate it has been claimed that the manner of death is natural which according to the complainant is self-contradictory because neither “adrenal homorrage” nor “pulmonary embolism” nor “fracture of D12 vertebra” could be considered as natural death of patient.

3. Learned Magistrate upon receipt of the complaint was pleased to take cognizance upon the offence on 03.01.2017 and thereafter the complainant was examined under section 200 of the Cr.P.C. and upon perusal of the complaint, learned Magistrate was pleased to find out a prima facie case against the present petitioners under section 304A of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly issued process against the petitioners

4. Being aggrieved by the instant proceeding, Mr. Milon Mukherjee learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that no medical professional shall be arraigned as an accused on the basis of a complaint by a private individual having no knowledge about medical science, so as to determine whether the act of the accused/medical profession