25.04.25

15 Ct. No.24 Sws.M WPA 28638 of 2022 Arun Baran Mangal Vs.

Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Ivan Roy Mr. Nirupam Dutta ….for the petitioner Ms. Sipra Mazumdar ….for the State-respondents Ms. Manika Roy ….for the NHAI Mr. Dwijiadas Chakraborty ….for the Union of India Petitioners plot of land was acquired by the concerned authority for construction and expansion of National Highway 32, vide LA Case No. LA/Addl/18 of 2019-20/NH-32. A portion of land of the petitioner was acquired in the said LA case. Accordingly, award of compensation was prepared for acquisition of petitioner’s land. The petitioner was served with a notice by the concerned authority determining his compensation. He again served with a notice under Section 3G of N. H. Act, 1956 to submit the details of his documents regarding his title over the plots of land. He produced the documents and made representations with the authority regarding his objections of the amount of compensation but his representations were not considered, hence this writ petition.

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the State authority that award of compensation was calculated by the concerned authority for acquisition of the petitione