SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 9519

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
RAHUL MIYA @ RAHUL RAHAMAN AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR – Respondent


24.04.2025 Serial no. 1 Ct. No. 3 CRR 152 of 2025 +

IA No.: CRAN 1 of 2025 Rahul Miya @ Rahul Rahaman & Ors.

Vs The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Ms. Suman Sehanabis (Mondal)

Ms. Aritri Chakraborty, ……… for the Petitioner Mr. Kallol Acharjee Mr. Chattu Roy, ……… for the State Mr. Kumarjit Bhattacharjee ……… for the De facto complainant

1. The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of the proceedings, being POCSO Case No.28 of 2022 arising out of Sitalkuchi Police Station Case No.90 of 2021 dated 24.04.2021 under Sections 363, 365 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 with added Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, pending before the Court of the Learned Special Judge (POCSO Act)-cum-Additional Sessions Judge at Mathabhanga, Cooch Behar, in view of the compromise arrived at by and between the petitioners/accused and the defacto complainant/opposite party no.2.

2. CRAN 1 of 2025 filed, is a joint application on affidavit stating that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement in the present case and the complainant/opposite party does not have any grievance if the proceedings in the present case is quashed in respect of the petitioners.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top