Ct. 11.07 RVW 303 of 2024 No.

29 2025 In S.A. 351 of 1995 akb Sima Sengupta & Anr.

–Versus-

Avik Sengupta & Ors.

Mr. Chittapriya Ghosh Ms. Sohini Chakraborty Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Ms. Sahana Pal …For the Petitioners Mr. Souvik Sarkar …For the Respondent No. 1 Mr. Partha Pratim Roy Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharya Mr. Asoke Das Ms. Priti Dutta …For the Respondent Nos. 2 – 4 Mr. Subhranil Ray …For Ms. Sudipa Ray Mr. Sandipan Pal …For the Proforma Respondent Nos. 5(a) & 8(b)

Dr. Rudra Dhar …For Ms. Ridita Sengupta, O.P.

No. 7(b)

In the judgment and order dated 22^nd April, 2025 the following corrections be made.

In the appearance portion, the name of “Dr. Dudra Dhar” be replaced by ‘Dr. Rudra Dhar’.

In the 3^rd line of paragraph 1 at page 2, the phrase “having any knowledge or consent or notice to” be replaced by the phrase “the knowledge or consent of or notice to”.

“remain” be replaced by the word “remained” and in the last but one line of the same page the word “to” be inserted before the word “an”.

“sengupta” be replaced by the word “Sengupta” and in the thirteenth line of the same paragraph, the phrase “of respondents,” be replaced by the phrase “of pro forma respondents” and the phrase “of other appellant” be replaced by the phrase “of the other appellants”.

In the 3^rd line of paragraph 2 at page 5, the word “respondent” be replaced by the word “opposite party ” and in the last line of the same page the phrase “the plaintiff” be replaced by the phrase “the array of plaintiffs”.

In the 1^st line of paragraph 2 at page 6, the phrase “opposite parties herein” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein”.

In the 7^th line of paragraph 2 at page 7, the phrase “opposite parties herein” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein” and in the 9^th line of same paragraph, the phrase “plaintiff decides” be replaced by the phrase “plaintiffs decide” and the word “descending” appearing in the 10^th line of same paragraph be replaced by the word “dissenting” and in the 13^th line of same paragraph, the phrase “the respondents” be replaced by the phrase “the pro forma respondents”.

“opposite party herein and the respondents” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein” and the 5^th line from the bottom, the word “seized” be replaced by the word “ceased”.

In the 2^nd line of paragraph 1 at page 9, the word “never” be replaced by the word “ever”, in the 2^nd line of paragraph 2, the phrase “known the’ be replaced by the phrase “known to the” and in the 10^th line of the same paragraph, the phrase “opposite parties” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein”.

In the 2^nd line of paragraph 5 at page 10, the word “applications” be replaced by the word “application”, Let this order be treated as part of the judgment and order dated 22^nd April, 2025.

Office is directed to make necessary corrections in the judgment and order dated 22^nd April, 2025.

Certified copy, if already supplied, be corrected accordingly.

Urgent photostat copy of the order, if applied for, be supplied to the petitioner on priority basis.

( Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)