SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 10182

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SAMIR BHATTACHARYA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
IPSITA SARKAR – Respondent


O 23 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE AP/43/2025 SAMIR BHATTACHARYA & ANR.

VS IPSITA SARKAR BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR Date : 21st April, 2025 Appearance:

Mr. Aditya Mondal, Adv.

Ms. Rupsa Sreemani, Adv. …for petitioners.

Mr. Shyamal Chakraborty, Adv.

Mr. Debajyoti Mondal, Adv.

Mr. Palash Goswami, Adv. …for respondent.

1. This is an application for appointment of a learned Arbitrator in terms of the arbitration clause, being clause 24 of the Partnership Agreement. It appears that the parties had agreed that all disputes and differences shall be referred to a sole arbitrator to be appointed by the parties. In case of disagreement over the arbitrator, the arbitrator would be appointed in terms of the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2. The petitioners have approached this court on failure of a consensus amongst the parties/partners to appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences which have cropped up between them.

3. Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate for the respondent submits that the terms and conditions of the said partnership deed do not indicate that the same was in effect a partner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top