CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
BINAPANI BISWAS – Respondent
D/L 76
21.04.2025 Court No.02 PRADIP CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE SIDE CO 63 of 2025 PNB MetLife India Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors Vs.
Binapani Biswas Mr. Meghajit Mukherjee Ms. Supriya Singh … for the Petitioners.
Mr. Subham Ghosh Mr. Mayank Roy …for the Opposite Party.
1. The Insurance Company has filed the instant Civil Revision Application challenging the order dated 17th March, 2025 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in NC/RP/370 of
2025.
2. Learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that no reasoning has been given by the Commission for upholding the order passed by the District Forum and the State Commission. It has been submitted that relying upon two different orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the impugned order was passed and no opportunity was given to the petitioners to deal with the same.
3. Learned advocate representing the opposite party/claimant submits, upon instruction that, the insured expired in the year 2015 and the widow is processing the claim for nearly the last ten years. The Execution Case being no. 6 of 2024 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Silig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.