SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 10259

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ANIL KUMAR MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay C.R.A. 142 of 1998 Anil Kumar Mondal -Vs-

The State of West Bengal For the Appellant : Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee (Amicus Curiae)

For the State : Mr. Avishek Sinha Heard on : 21.05.2024, 01.10.2024 Judgment on : 21.04.2025 Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.:-

1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 09.03.1998 passed by the Learned Judge, Special Court, under the Essential Commodities Act, Murshidabad in E.C. Case No.40 of 1991 (corresponding T.R. No.32 of 1993) thereby convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act and for violation of paragraph 3(1)(b) of West Bengal Rice and Paddy Licensing Control Order, 1967 and para 3(2) of West Bengal Declaration Stocks and Prices of Essential Commodity Order, 1977 and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment in 3 months and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month more.

2. The prosecution case precisely stated on 12.04.91 the complainant i.e., PW-3 along with others were conducting raid at the grocery shop of the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top