CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
DEBASHIS ROY – Appellant
Versus
MD IQBAL AND ORS – Respondent
Ct. 16.05 C.O. 3797 of 2024 No.
29 2025 Sri Debashis Roy Vs.
Md. Iqbal & Ors.
akb Mr. Sourav Guhathakurta Mr. Surajit Dutta Mr. Avratanu Sarkar …For the Petitioner Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. In spite of service, opposite parties are not represented.
Being aggrieved by the order dated 7th September, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), 2nd Court, Asansol, Paschim Bardhaman in Title Suit no. 482 of 2021, present application has been preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff no. 1. By the impugned order, learned court below allowed defendants’ prayer under Order 39 Rule
7 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Being aggrieved by the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the court below has passed the impugned order in a cryptic manner and failed to consider the nature of the petition for local inspection commission filed by the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 herein. The petitioner herein as plaintiff have obtained ad-interim order of injunction against opposite party herein but inspite of injunction order opposite party tried to dispossess the petitioner and for which petitioner filed a petition for police help and thereaft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.