SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 11057

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SK NABIBUR RAHAMAN AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SAIDUL MALLICK AND ANR – Respondent


12.9.2025

432 sb CO 3882 of 2024 Sk. Nabibur Rahaman & Ors.

Vs.

Saidul Mallick & Anr.

Ms. Soumita Dutta …for the Petitioners Mr. Partha Pratim Roy Ms. Subhangi Bhattacharya …for the O.P. no. 1 Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order no.

25 dated 7th May, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 2nd Court, Chandernagore, Hooghly in Title Suit no. 212 of 2022, the petitioners have preferred this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, wherein and whereby the Trial court has rejected the petitioners’ application for adding them as parties in the suit under the provision of Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Trial court has rejected the petitioners’ prayer without appreciating that the right, title and interest of the petitioners have to be prejudiced, if the suit is heard in the absence of the present petitioners. Court below also failed to appreciate that plaintiff has shown the petitioners land as his own, which is clear from the sketch map annexed with the plaint, where plaintiff is claiming decree of ownership over a strip of land which falls within the plot of land owned by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top