D/L- 67

25/03/2025 Ct. No.-6 Aritra C.O. 4489 of 2024 Sujit Kumar Dey Vs.

Mithu Dey & Anr.

Ms. Sohini Chakraborty Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharyya Mr. Varun Kothari Mr. Arya Bhattacharyya Ms. Prajaini Das …for the petitioner Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharya Ms. Sharmila Nath ….for the opposite party Ms. Chakraborty, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that though the orders dated July 20, 2024 and November 16, 2024 were challenged in the civil revision application but through inadvertence, in the preamble portion only the order date November 16, 2024 has been mentioned. The certified copy of the order dated July 20, 2024 has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record.

As prayed for by Ms. Chakraborty learned advocate for the petitioner leave is granted to the advocate on record of the petitioner to amend the preamble portion of the civil revision application, here and now.

The opposite party herein filed a suit for specific performance of contract. Such suit was decreed ex parte on December 12, 2016.

The petitioner herein filed a misc case under Order

9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for setting aside the ex parte decree. In the meantime, the ex parte decree was put in