SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 11091

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
WILHELMSEN PORT SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


25.03.2025 Item No.6 gd/ssd MAT/319/2025 WILHELMSEN PORT SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.

VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

IA NO: CAN/1/2025 Mr. Himangshu Kumar Ray.

Mr. Arup Dasgupta, Ms. Shiwani Shaw, Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Mr. Subhasis Podder, Mr. Animitra Roy, Mr. Piyas Chowdhury, Mr. Amit Saha ..for the Appellants.

Md. T.M. Siddiqui, Mr. N. Chatterjee, Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty, Mr. Saptak Sanyal ..for the State.

1. This intra court appeal by the writ petitioners is directed against an interim direction dated 24th February, 2025 in WPA 406 of 2025.

2. In the said order the learned Single Bench exercised discretion while granting an order of stay by directing the appellants to pay 10% of the balance amount of tax in dispute.

3. We have elaborately heard the learned counsel for either of the parties.

4. Under normal circumstances in an intra court appeal, the court will not interfere with the discretion exercised by the learned Single Bench.

5. However, in the instant case the peculiar facts and circumstances persuade us to grant an order of stay of the impugned orders in the writ petition without any condition.

6. This is because the case of the appellant/writ petitioners is that they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top