CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SANTOSH KUMAR MAHATO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
24.03.2025 Court No.24 Item No.30 CP WPA No.2841 of 2025 with CAN 1 of 2025 Santosh Kumar Mahato Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. S. R. Das Mr. K. P. Mukhopadhyay Mr. S. Rakshit …… for the Petitioner.
Ms. Sonal Sinha Mr. Amritlal Chatterjee Ms. Shabnam Farooqui ...... for the State.
Mr. Saibal Acharya Mr. S. B. Mukherjee ……for the respondent no. 6.
Mr. Santi Pada Pahari Ms. Subhasri Chatterjee ……for the additional parties.
(in CAN 1 of 2025) Re: CAN 1 of 2025 CAN 1 of 2025 is an application for addition of parties by the proposed proforma respondents.
It appears that the intending proposed proforma respondents have tried to represent themselves under representative capacity on behalf of the villagers of village – ‘Pardi’, under Police Station Jhalda, District – Purulia. It also appears that the application being CAN
1 of 2025 is filed not in accordance with the provision under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Hence, the application being CAN 1 of 2025 is disposed of with a liberty to the applicants to file it afresh.
Re: WPA No.2841 of 2025 Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
It appears to this Court that the instant writ petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.