SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 11243

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
DEBASHIS ROY – Appellant
Versus
MD IQBAL AND ORS – Respondent


Ct. 16.05 C.O. 3797 of 2024 No.

29 2025 Sri Debashis Roy Vs.

Md. Iqbal & Ors.

akb Mr. Sourav Guhathakurta Mr. Surajit Dutta Mr. Avratanu Sarkar …For the Petitioner Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. In spite of service, opposite parties are not represented.

Being aggrieved by the order dated 7th September, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), 2nd Court, Asansol, Paschim Bardhaman in Title Suit no. 482 of 2021, present application has been preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff no. 1. By the impugned order, learned court below allowed defendants’ prayer under Order 39 Rule

7 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Being aggrieved by the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the court below has passed the impugned order in a cryptic manner and failed to consider the nature of the petition for local inspection commission filed by the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 herein. The petitioner herein as plaintiff have obtained ad-interim order of injunction against opposite party herein but inspite of injunction order opposite party tried to dispossess the petitioner and for which petitioner filed a petition for police help and thereaft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top