IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay W.P.A. 4161 of 2010 H. K. Sikdar @ Himangshu Kumar Simdar -Vs-

Union of India & Ors.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Indranath Mitra Mr. Sankha Biswas For the Respondents/U.O.I. : Mr. Niladri Saha Heard on : 19.06.2025, 12.08.2025 Judgment on : 24.10.2025 Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.:-

1. The petitioner, a Constable of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), bearing Force No.893440622, presently assailed in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, three impugned orders – namely, (i) the Memorandum of Charge dated 07.05.2008, (ii) the Final Order of Punishment dated 08.11.2008, and (iii) the Appellate Authority’s order dated 12.03.2009 – whereby he was visited with the penalty of reduction in pay to the minimum of the time scale for a period of five years, entailing consequential deprivation of increments and future pay progression.

2. The fact of this case revealed while the petitioner was deployed on additional duty between 19:00 and 23:00 hrs. on 20th April 2008, between watch towers Nos.2 and 3 of Alloy Steel Plant, Durgapur, certain miscreants allegedly attempted to remove approximately one metric tonne of scrap material from the slag dump yard adjoining boundary wall pillars 299 to 301. It was the case of the Disciplinary Authority that the petitioner, though stationed about 20 metres from the said spot, failed to apprehend or even challenge the miscreants, thereby exhibiting gross negligence and dereliction of duty.

3. A Memorandum of Charge under Rule 36 of the CISF Rules, 2001, was accordingly issued and after a departmental enquiry, the petitioner was found guilty of misconduct. The punishment of reduction of pay was imposed and the subsequent appeal preferred by the Appellate Authority.

4. The petitioner, being aggrieved, invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, contending that the enquiry was vitiated by serious procedural lapses, non- application of mind and a complete disregard of principles of natural justice.

5. The Learned Advocate representing the petitioner submitted as follows:- i. The petitioner, a Constable serving under the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), at the material time in April 2008, was attached to the CISF Unit, Durgapur Steel Plant. He was deputed for additional duty between 19:00 hrs. on 20.04.2008, covering the stretch between Watch Tower Nos.02 and 03 of the Alloy Steel Plant (ASP).

ii. Admittedly, on the said date, Constable J.P. Acharjee, bearing No.944521079 was simultaneously performing regular ‘B’ Shift duty in the same zone. At around 20:40 hrs., the Assistant Commandant, Shri S.K. Jha, during a surprise inspection, purportedly found Constable Acharjee conversing with an unidentified individual upon which the said individual fled into the plant premises. Simultaneously, a group of 12-13 miscreants sitting on the boundary wall reportedly jumped down and escaped on the outer side.

iii. A General Diary Entry (GDE) was instituted to record the occurrence, and on the following day, the petitioner was placed under suspension. Subsequently, a Memorandum of Charge dated 07.05.2008 was issued, alleging failure to maintain absolute integrity, gross negligence, and dereliction of duty. The articles of charge, statement of imputation, and supporting documents were enclosed.

iv. The petitioner participated in the departmental enquiry, submitted his defence, and also filed representation on the findings of the Enquiry Officer. His suspension was later revoked on 26.08.2008. However, upon conclusion of the proceedings, the Senior Commandant, CISF, by order dated 08.11.2008, imposed on the petitioner the punishment of reduction of pay to the minimum of Rs. 7510/- in the revised scale under the 6th Pay Commission for five years, with deprivation of increments during the said period, further directing that such reduction would have a cascading effect on fu