SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 11381

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
AMITAVA DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

28 21.3.2025 Sc Ct. no.2 WPA 16325 OF 2017 ------ --------

Amitava Das Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Amitava Das …. Petitioner appears in person Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay Mr. Srinath Singha Roy.

…. For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 7 & 8 Mr. Satyajit Talukdar Mr. Arindom Chatterjee.

…. For the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6/KMDA The petitioner appears in person.

Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay, learned Senior Government Advocate with Mr. Srinath Singha Roy, learned State advocate appears for the respondent nos.

1 to 3, 7 and 8, the acquiring body.

Mr. Satyajit Talukdar, learned advocate appears for the respondent nos. 4 to 6, KMDA, the requiring body.

The relevant facts are that, acquisition of the subject land is admitted. There is no challenge to that neither was there any challenge contemporaneously. The acquisition process was initiated during the period 1977 till 1978 under two land acquisition cases. The father of the petitioner, Bimal Kumar Das, since deceased, was the actual land loser.

The document at pages 30-31 to the writ petition shows that, an award was declared in favour of the petitioner’s deceased fathe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top