SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 11911

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
HOOGHLY INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
SK ALAM ISMAIL AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present :

The Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

WPA 28770 of 2024 Hooghly Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

C & C R Vs.

Sk. Alam Ismail & Ors.

For the Petitioner : Mr. S. K. Singh, Mr. R. K. Dubey.

For the State : Mr. Srinath Singha Roy.

For the Respondent : Mr. Uddipan Banerjee, No. 1 Mr. Subhra Kanti Samanta.

For the Sr. Govt. Adv. : Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay.

Hearing concluded on : 07.03.2025 Judgment on : 18.03.2025 Shampa Dutt (Paul) , J.

1. The present writ application has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondents to cancel and set aside the orders dated 21.11.2023 and 18.09.2024, passed by the Controlling Authority and the Appellate Authority respectively under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

2. The petitioner‟s case is that the respondent no. 1 was engaged in petitioner‟s company as a Badli worker on 24.05.1978. The respondent no. 1 got his provident fund membership only in the year 1981. The respondent no. 1 attained the age of superannuation on 01.07.2015 as a Badli. Throughout this period i.e., 24.05.1978 to 30.06.2015 the respondent no. 1 worked as „badli‟ employee i.e., in place and stead o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top