SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 12276

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PRATUL KUMAR NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
UNITED BANK OF INDIA & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: - Hon’ble Mr. Justice Subhendu Samanta.

IN THE MATTER OF WPA 2728 (W) of 2020 With CAN 1 of 2022 Pratul Kumar Nayak Vs.

United Bank of India & Ors For the Petitioners : Mr. Sidhartha Banerjee, Adv., Ms. Chittapriya Ghosh, Adv., Mr. Gautam Acharya, Adv., Ms. Priyanka Saha, Adv.

For the respondent Bank : Mr. RN Majumder, Adv.

Mr. S.M. Obaidullah, Adv.

Mr. R. Chowdhury Adv Reserved on : 27.03.2025 Judgment on : 11.06.2025 Subhendu Samanta, J.

1. Petitioner was working as a Head Cashier, United Bank of India Raghurampur Branch, under Purba Medinipur region. He was served with a memo Dated 17th March 2018 issued by Chief Manager (DIR) and a competent Authority, by such he had been suspended from service with immediate effect pending disciplinary action and disposal thereof. Subsequently a charge sheet dated 17.11.2018 was issued against the petitioner alleging gross misconduct in terms of Clause 5 (a) and Clause 5 (k) read with Clause 5 (j) of memorandum of settlement dated 10.04.2002.

2. Petitioner submitted written statement of defence against the said charge sheet. Chief Manager (DIR) and Disciplinary Au

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top